Charts
Rulebook
Alamaze Home Page
Forum Index
Search
Member List
Help
10-17-2016, 06:58 PM
(10-16-2016, 07:40 PM)Devildog Wrote:(10-16-2016, 06:01 PM)Wookie Panz Wrote:(10-16-2016, 05:00 PM)Devildog Wrote: GN
I can not speak for the Tyrant but the gnomes have have appreciated the other kingdom's forbearance to date in allowing us to settle our disagreements one on one.
At the same time we notice alliances forming and tensions rising and don't want to become a target due to having too narrow a focus.
Are there any kingdoms that would like to enter into discussions regarding NAPS or other agreements? Any such agreement would not require intervention against the Tyrant
(RA) - GN I can assure you there is nothing for you to worry about regarding the Ranger Kingdom. You have been a good neighbor and I plan to stay at peace with you. I have NAPS with several positions and can continue one with you if you feel it is necessary. As you may know , I do have a mutual defense pact with SA and if he should suffer an unprovoked attack I would be drawn into it. Are you just interested in a continuation of our previous NAP, or something stronger and more protective?
As I understand it the TY position is now at war with SA and he is no longer welcome in Arcania either.
Please tell me what you can about his groups and where they are so that I may be prepared to counter anything he may try.
GN-RA
The gnomes share your good will and trust. NAPS are welcome but I am open to defensive alliances as well.
The Tyrant recruits, combines, and separates his forces frequently. Next turn this info may well be obsolete. The group closest to Arcania is the 6th tyrant army with 10 brigades. I don't have its exact position. It is not at one of my pop centers. I don't suspect that it will move into Arcania this turn.
(RA) -GN That TY group 6 is in Arcania now and I can deal with him there. Also, how do you feel about a MDA (mutual defense agreement)? It seems all the other agreements are running until at least turn 20, if not longer.