Charts
Rulebook
Alamaze Home Page
Forum Index
Search
Member List
Help
10-06-2016, 05:19 PM
(10-05-2016, 06:33 AM)Wookie Panz Wrote:(10-04-2016, 09:33 PM)Acererak Wrote: (NO) I'm good with PI then GN getting a whirl unopposed, and after that it's time to bid.
NO-RA : Shall we extend our NAP until turn 20?
(RA) Agreed to NAP until or through turn 20. In fact, we can go till game end if you like as you have proven trustworthy.
Also agree to PI, then GN on High Counsel then open bidding.
(10-06-2016, 04:04 PM)Wookie Panz Wrote:(10-06-2016, 01:33 PM)RELLGAR Wrote: SA-NO Lord of the sands, it's nice for you to visit our kingdom, some notice of your arrival next time would be encouraged. I surmise that there is no non aggression treaty between us, what are your intensions? Would you like to exchange ambassadors now?
RELLGAR The Great
SA-RA Good friend Sir Ranger, it appears we may soon need your assistance. I believe a 2 turn warning of intent to dissolve your NAP with the Nomad is honorable, should it be necessary.
RELLGAR
(RA) - NO, and SA It appears my diplomacy puts me in the middle of a potential conflict. I have a long term NAP with NO and a long term Mutual Defense Pact with SA.
No, might it be possible to turn your attentions elsewhere? GN could certainly use some major help and TY has most of Runnimede. I've a NAP with both of them that will soon be over.
NO- Not sure what the SA is talking about. We are but a poor desert folk, unskilled in the ways of war. Theoretically however, I do believe our NAP was in force prior to and continually since your pact with the
SA. I assume you will honor that agreement first. You are of course welcome to give me two turn warning of intent to withdraw and commence hostile action against me on the third turn if you wish. That is your choice. I prefer to keep our agreement.