05-08-2020, 08:47 PM
From a game strategy point of view, I think so, even 100 gold per turn for an Ambassador, 200 for a governor etc. Whatever.
It seems odd that this weapon that some kingdoms have but others do not costs nothing to have. It does cost to use.
Now a counterargument is with castles, etc., the emissaries lose effectiveness eventually.
From a story point of view, maybe the "influence" cost is the ruler giving them lands etc. to support this ongoing cost.
It does seem to me that having a huge diplomatic corps at capital, should cost something on a maintainence basis, just like a big army you have, but arn't using.
Just thinking about it.
It seems odd that this weapon that some kingdoms have but others do not costs nothing to have. It does cost to use.
Now a counterargument is with castles, etc., the emissaries lose effectiveness eventually.
From a story point of view, maybe the "influence" cost is the ruler giving them lands etc. to support this ongoing cost.
It does seem to me that having a huge diplomatic corps at capital, should cost something on a maintainence basis, just like a big army you have, but arn't using.
Just thinking about it.