![]() |
170/171 Question - Printable Version +- Alamaze & Fall of Rome Forum (https://kingdomsofarcania.net/forum) +-- Forum: ALAMAZE (https://kingdomsofarcania.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +--- Forum: General Discussion (https://kingdomsofarcania.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +--- Thread: 170/171 Question (/showthread.php?tid=8591) |
170/171 Question - HeadHoncho - 08-19-2013 Is it possible to 170 or 171 multiple times with the same group on the same turn? Or does only the first order actually resolve? RE: 170/171 Question - Cipher - 08-19-2013 Why would you want to? There with another kingdom's group? RE: 170/171 Question - HeadHoncho - 08-19-2013 I'm assuming -- perhaps erroneously -- that there is a random element to 170/171, just like with political emissaries. If that's the case, then multiple 171's (in particular) might be helpful. If that's an incorrect assumption, then never mind. ![]() RE: 170/171 Question - Hawk_ - 08-20-2013 (08-19-2013, 09:18 PM)HeadHoncho Wrote: I'm assuming -- perhaps erroneously -- that there is a random element to 170/171, just like with political emissaries. If that's the case, then multiple 171's (in particular) might be helpful. 171 is much stronger than 170. If you doubt your success rate I would try 171 and save an order. Ideally a PC is neutral OR human controlled and you are friendly in the region. Otherwise you need a pretty big group in most cases. (If you did not already know) Best of luck, RE: 170/171 Question - HeadHoncho - 08-20-2013 Thanks, I get that, I guess I'm more curious about whether there's a random element to 171, to see if multiple 171's would be beneficial (or even possible). Separately, has anyone tried 171 in a Suspicious or Hostile region? Just wondering it it's worth bothering, even with a higher-level wizard. RE: 170/171 Question - kik1661 - 08-20-2013 (08-20-2013, 03:06 PM)HeadHoncho Wrote: Thanks, I get that, I guess I'm more curious about whether there's a random element to 171, to see if multiple 171's would be beneficial (or even possible). Playing the DW in 100 I was able to 171 other kingdom's towns while Suspicious with a 25kish group, a marshal, and a p3. Looking back I went 3 for 5 on those 171 attempts. I have no idea about multiple 171's though but seems easy enough to test. RE: 170/171 Question - HeadHoncho - 08-20-2013 Thanks, that's a helpful data point (or five points, rather). Anyone else? ![]() RE: 170/171 Question - Keeope - 08-21-2013 (08-20-2013, 05:56 PM)kik1661 Wrote:(08-20-2013, 03:06 PM)HeadHoncho Wrote: Thanks, I get that, I guess I'm more curious about whether there's a random element to 171, to see if multiple 171's would be beneficial (or even possible). I would imagine you could cast multiple 171s vs any PC, provided you have enough wizards. Each wizard can only cast once per turn. |